首页> 外文OA文献 >How is a data-driven approach better than random choice in label space division for multi-label classification?
【2h】

How is a data-driven approach better than random choice in label space division for multi-label classification?

机译:数据驱动方法如何比标签空间中的随机选择更好   多标签分类的划分?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We propose using five data-driven community detection approaches from socialnetworks to partition the label space for the task of multi-labelclassification as an alternative to random partitioning into equal subsets asperformed by RAkELd: modularity-maximizing fastgreedy and leading eigenvector,infomap, walktrap and label propagation algorithms. We construct a labelco-occurence graph (both weighted an unweighted versions) based on trainingdata and perform community detection to partition the label set. We includeBinary Relevance and Label Powerset classification methods for comparison. Weuse gini-index based Decision Trees as the base classifier. We compare educatedapproaches to label space divisions against random baselines on 12 benchmarkdata sets over five evaluation measures. We show that in almost all cases seveneducated guess approaches are more likely to outperform RAkELd than otherwisein all measures, but Hamming Loss. We show that fastgreedy and walktrapcommunity detection methods on weighted label co-occurence graphs are 85-92%more likely to yield better F1 scores than random partitioning. Infomap on theunweighted label co-occurence graphs is on average 90% of the times better thanrandom paritioning in terms of Subset Accuracy and 89% when it comes to Jaccardsimilarity. Weighted fastgreedy is better on average than RAkELd when it comesto Hamming Loss.
机译:我们建议使用来自社交网络的五种数据驱动的社区检测方法来为多标签分类任务分配标签空间,以替代随机划分为由RAkELd执行的相等子集的方法:最大化模块化的快速贪婪和领先特征向量,信息图,助行器和标签传播算法。我们基于训练数据构造了一个标签共现图(均加权了未加权版本),并执行了社区检测以划分标签集。我们包括二进制相关性和标签Powerset分类方法进行比较。我们使用基于gini-index的决策树作为基础分类器。我们在5种评估方法的12个基准数据集上比较了受教育的方法和标签相对于随机基线的空间划分。我们表明,在几乎所有情况下,采用七种方法进行猜测的方法比所有其他方法都可能优于RAkELd,但汉明损失法则除外。我们显示,加权标签共现图上的快速贪婪和助步社区检测方法比随机分区产生更好的F1分数的可能性高85-92%。就子集准确度而言,未加权标签共现图上的信息图平均比随机划分好90%,而在Jaccardlikeness方面平均要好89%。在汉明损失方面,加权fastgreedy平均优于RAkELd。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号